The decision it drives
Approve owner settlements, or dispute a charge before it reaches settlement.
Where the numbers come from
Access charges, access agreements, Owner Payables statuses, and settlement references.
How you can slice it
What it will look like
Example — season 2026, all amounts in USD.
| Owner | Accrued | In settlement | Paid at access | Settled |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estancia La Bordona | 200 | 5,000 | 100 | 0 |
| Estancia Río Claro | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,200 |
| Puesto Norte | No charges this period | — | — | — |
What each number means
Accrued
Sum of charges still accruing to the owner — not yet in settlement.
In settlement
Sum of charges already grouped into an owner settlement awaiting approval.
Paid at access
Sum already paid in the field by a guide — informational, not owed.
Settled
Sum with a final settlement in the period.
How to verify it
Run the three access scenarios once each with known amounts, then open the report:
- 1
USD 50 per-client charge × 4 client-days → the owner shows USD 200 accrued.
- 2
USD 100 guide-paid crossing → USD 100 under paid at access, never counted as owed.
- 3
USD 5,000 season charge → USD 5,000 in its configured status, per currency, no conversion.
When there is nothing to show
- An owner with an agreement but no charges shows “no charges this period” — never a silent zero.
- Charges awaiting scenario classification are flagged, never bucketed silently.